Donald Trump VS Human Rights

During his speech in Saudi Arabia, with most Muslim leaders attending the speech, Trump said that the US will not dictate to other countries how they are going to live, or how they will run their countries. As expected the left and the Muslim Brotherhood in Europe and USA went mad with “fascist” Trump, who does not care about human rights violations etc.

Trump Sisi Salman

However what really annoys them is not any human rights violation etc, but what Trump really meant. When Trrump said the USA will not dictate to others how they live, he meant that he thinks it is very reasonable that the Egyptian President Sisi and the Saudi King Salman attack the revolts orchestrated in their countries by the Muslim Brotherhood, with the support of Qatar, Turkey and Iran. In a sentence, Trump is not prepared to support with the American army the so-called “democratic” revolutions, which are financed by the Muslim Brotherhood in the Muslim World.

On the other hand, President Obama, who is the seed of an anti-American Shite Muslim from Kenya, had invited the Muslim Brotherhood during his equivalent speech of Cairo in 2009. With his speech, Obama encouraged Turkey, Iran and Qatar to support the revolts of Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and Saudi Arabia, which was manifested with the Arab Spring of Egypt and Saudi Arabia.

In Saudi Arabia the Muslim Brotherhood was not successful, due to the Saudi financial reserves. But in Egypt, with her troubled economy which is poor in oil and gas, the Brotherhood went much further. The biggest news network of the Brotherhood is Aljazeera, the socialist anti-American network of the Emir of Qatar.

The plan was that the Muslim Brotherhood would come to power in the Middle East and North Africa, and then Iran would join, and there would be a Muslim arch against Russia, which would supply Europe and India with Muslim gas and oil. Russia has already designated the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization, and Trump is thinking about doing the same.

Image The Obama Doctrine

Map the Obama Doctrine

So when you hear the left and the Muslim Brotherhood saying that Trump does not stand for human rights, you must know that what they really mean is that he does not support the “democratic” revolutions of the Muslim Brotherhood. You will never hear them complaining about human right violations in China and Iran. In China and Iran, if you strongly criticize the regimes, it is very likely that you will disappear. And yet you will never hear the left or the Muslim Brotherhood complaining about human right violations in China and Iran. They only care about human right violations in Saudi Arabia and Egypt, when the “democratic” revolutions of the Muslim Brotherhood are brought to their knees. Human rights kiss my ass.

The Chessboard of Kurdistan

As expected, Donald Trump continued the Obama policy of supporting the Kurds of Syria, a policy which continues to threaten the US-Turkish relations. Actually Trump supplied the Kurds with heavier arms than the Obama administration.

The new Sultan of Turkey, Tayip Erdogan, complained to the Russians, but the Russians said they will no longer supply the Kurds of Syria with arms, and that’s all they can do. According to the Russians, as far as the American armaments are concerned, the Turks should contact their American allies.

Both the American and Russian responses are very normal, because the Americans and the Russians can use the Kurds to establish a balance of power in the Middle East, if they reach an agreement. The Kurds can be very useful to both the Americans and the Russians.

To the Russians because if Turkey and the Arabs, with NATO’s support, decide to push for the energy corridor of the Muslim Brotherhood i.e. Persian Gulf-Turkey-Europe, undermining the Russian economic interests in Europe, the Russians will use the allies they have in the Syrian Kurdistan to cause chaos. The Russians can also use the Kurds of the Turkish Kurdistan (PKK) to cause chaos in Turkey, if the Turks, together with the Kazakhs, the Turkmen and the Azerbaijanis, try to create a Muslim energy axis i.e. Caspian Sea-Turkey-Europe, which undermines the Russian interests in Europe too.


Map Russia and the Kurds


On the other hand, if Turkey reaches an agreement with Russia and China, and tries to block the United States from the Middle East, the Americans will be have the choice to use their Kurdish allies and go to war, in order to create a Kurdish corridor that will connect the Caspian Sea, the Persian Gulf and the Mediterranean Sea, avoiding the Sunni parts of Syria and Iraq.

Map The Americans and the Kurds


Therefore the Kurds can be a balancing force for the Americans and the Russians, if they reach an agreement, because both the Russians and the Americans will know they will be able to use the Kurds if the other party crosses them. See “The Obama and the Trump Doctrine”.

In other words, the presence of the Kurds can reassure both the Americans and the Russians, that the Turks will not cross them, since both the Americans and the Russians have Kurdish allies. Obviously that is not good for Sultan Erdogan and Turkey, who want both the Americans and the Russians to beg them for cooperation, playing the Americans against the Russians. But Turkey is a smaller player than Russia and the United States, and if the two countries reach an agreement Turkey will have to respect it if it wants to prosper and avoid war.

The only other thing Sultan Erdogan can do is to join an axis with China, Pakistan and Iran. Turkey has already joined this axis but only commercially and not militarily.

Image China-Pakistan-Iran-Turkey

Χάρτης Ρωσία ΗΠΑ Κίνα.JPG

But at this point I doubt that if Russia and the United States reach an agreement in the Middle East, the Chinese will have an appetite to break it. That depends of course on the whole agenda of the American-Chinese relations i.e. who controls Iraq, what happens with the Chinese militarization of the South China Sea, and what happens with the US trade deficits with China. But Trump is trying to reach an agreement with the Chinese too, and not only with the Russians i.e. “The Art of the Deal”. The Americans are very lucky to have such a great leader during such difficult times.

However not all is black for Turkey. If the Americans and the Russians reach an agreement in the Middle East, they might not promote an independent Kurdish State. The Americans want an independent Kurdish state in Syria and Iraq, and the Russians want an independent Kurdish state in Turkey.

Map Kurdistan

Map Kurdistan Pipelines.JPG

The Turks, the Syrians, the Iraqis and the Iranians do not want an independent Kurdish state, even though they have all been using the Kurds against their opponents. Therefore if the Americans and the Russians reach an agreement they might not push for and independent Kurdistan. Or they might create an independent Kurdistan in Iraq for example, because Turkey has allies in Iraqi Kurdistan. Turkey is the natural importer of the oil and gas of Iraqi Kurdistan. The Kurds of Syria, Iran and Turkey on the other hand, contrary to what happens with the Kurds of Iraq, are very poor in oil and gas.

Map Oil (black) and Natural Gas (red) Reserves

Map of Oil and Gas.jpg

The Kurdish people are in exactly the same position that the Jewish people were before WW1, when the British, the French, the Germans and the Russians were fighting for the oil pipelines of Iraq to the Mediterranean Sea. In the end the British and the French won, and a Jewish state was created after WW2, but only after Palestine was soaked with Jewish blood. The same can happen for the Kurdish people. A similar great war can break out for the natural gas pipelines of Qatar-Turkey, Iran-Turkey, Turkmenistan-Turkey, and this war can lead to the creation of a Kurdish state, but only after Kurdistan is soaked with Kurdish blood, exactly as Palestine was soaked with Jewish blood.

Remember that before WW2 Jewish people were as divided as the Kurdish people are today. There were Jews who were with the British (Haganah), and there were Jewish terrorist organizations that were supported by Britain’s enemies i.e. Russia, even Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy, and they were carrying terrorist attacks against Great Britain. In 1917 Britain had promised to create a Jewish state in Palestine (Israel+Jordan) in case of victory in WW1.

Similarly, the Kurdish people are equally divided today, and some of them are Russia’s allies, some are America’s allies etc. Syria, with Russia’s blessings, was supporting the Kurds of Turkey against Turkey, and the Americans were supporting the Kurds of Iraq against Saddam Hussein in Iraq. The Kurds are divided even within each country. For example there was a Kurdish civil war in Iraq in the 90s.


The New Frankenstein : Al-Qaeda+ISIS

Interesting article from the National Interest magazine. See “An ISIS–Al Qaeda ‘Frankenstein’ Could Be On Its Way”, May 2017. The article is about the emergence of a possible alliance between Al-Qaeda and ISIS in Syria and Iraq, which will be a headache for the United States.

I want to add a few things. An alliance between ISIS and Al-Qaeda is indeed possible in the Sunni parts of Syria and Iraq, after Donald Trmp’s victory. As long as the Americans wanted to overturn the Shias (Alawites) of Bashar al Assad in Syria, the Sunnis of Syria had a motive to cooperate with the Americans in order to defeat Bashar al Assad, because Bashar al Assad was backed by Russia.

Map Sunni,  Shia and Kurdist Syria and Iraq

Al-Qaeda ISIS

That’s why Al-Qaeda broke her links with Iran in Syria, and said it would suspend her attacks against Western targes, in order to focus on overturning Bashar al-Assad, hoping to cooperate with her old rival NATO against Assad. This strategy seemed to work, and at some point the ex-CIA director, General Petreaus, said that maybe the United States would have to cooperate with Al-Qaeda in Syria, in order to defeat ISIS. Al-Qaeda of Syria even changed her name in 2015.

The Sunnis of Iraq, contrary to what was happening with the Sunnis of Syria, wanted to overturn the Shias of Iraq, who were backed by the Americans, and therefore they had a motive to cooperate with Russia. Iraq’s oil is located in the southern (Shia) and northern (Kurdish) parts of Iraq.

Map Oil (black) and Natural Gas (red) Reserves

Map of Oil and Gas Reserves.JPG

Al-Qaeda ISIS

Therefore the Sunnis of Syria (Muslim Brotherhood and Al-Qaeda) had a motive to cooperate with the Americans in order to overturn the Russian backed Shias (Alawites) of Assad, while the Sunnis of Iraq, i.e. the ex-people of Saddam Housein (ISIS), had a motive to cooperate with Russian in order to overturn the Shia of Iraq who were supported by the United States.

That’s why Assad, with Russia’s blessings, helped the ex-people of Saddam Hussein (ISIS) to gain control of some oil fields in Syria and Iraq, in order to finance and army and attack the Sunnis of Syria who were cooperating with the United States, France, Turkey and Qatar i.e. the Muslim Brotherhood and Al-Qaeda of Syria.

The French bombed ISIS’s oil fields, and ISIS carried out the terrorist attacks in France in 2015 and 2016, obviously with support from Bashar al Assad. Bashar al Assad has also been the traditional supporter of the Kurdish PKK, and has supported many terrorist attacks in Turkey.

With Trump’s election, the Republicans want to leave Syria to Russia, in exchange for Iraq i.e. for Russia to stop supporting Iran and ISIS against the United States in Iraq. The Americans also expect Russians not to support China, if China decides to support Iran in Iraq. Trump accuses China of taking advantage of the post-Saddam oil industry of Iraq, while it was the Americans who paid billions to overturn him.

If Russia and United States reach an agreement, and the United States does indeed stop supporting rebels against Assad and Russia in Syria, and Russia does indeed stop supporting rebels against the United States in Iraq, the Sunnis of Syria will not have a chance to overturn Assad, and the Sunnis of Iraq will not have a chance of defeating the United States and overturning the Shias of Iraq. Therefore the Sunnis of Iraq and the Sunnis of Syria will no longer have obvious conflicting interests, and tey might decide to cooperate, and the same might be true for Al-Qaeda of Syria and ISIS of Iraq.

The Sunni parts of Syria and Iraq have no oil, and the Sunni parts of Syria and Iraq can be used as a corridor to connect China and Iran with the Mediterranean Sea, if China decides to go against Russia. Or the Sunni parts of Syria and Iraq can be used to connect Turkey and the Arabs of the Gulf, if Turkey goes against Russia. But this options would undermine either Russia’s or America’s interests. The best solution is for Russia to keep Syria and for United States to keep Iraq. If Russia and United States agree on that, and China and Iran do not interfere, Russia and United States can execute the terrorists of Al-Qaeda and ISIS in Syria and Iraq.

But it seems very reasonable for Al-Qaeda and ISIS, both very weakened by Trump’s victory, to consider uniting their forces. What is important for the future of ISIS and Al-Qaeda, is how USA, Russia and China manage to deal with their differences. If they manage to find a solution, ISIS and Al-Qaeda will have limited logistical and training support, and they will not be able to carry out large scale attacks.


12 Map Chinese Empire


11 Obama VS Trump

Map Erbil-Ceyhan PipelineJPG

Map Gazprom Pipelines

Map Oil and Gas Reserves and Pipelines


Map Erbil-Ceyhan PipelineJPG

“An ISIS–Al Qaeda ‘Frankenstein’ Could Be On Its Way”, May 2017




The USA, Russia, China Triangle and the Fall of the Soviet Union

A Changing Geopolitical Landscape

During WW2 the United States and China were allies against Japan. They were later joined by the Soviets, when the German Nazis broke their alliance with the Russian Communists, and they invaded Russia in 1941, in order to get hold of the oil of Baku (Azerbaijan). But the Nazis were defeated at Stalingrad and they never reached Baku.

1 The USA Russia China Triangle

After jointly destroying the Nazis in WW2, the Soviets and the Americans became enemies once more, and the Soviets supported the Chinese Communists, while the Americans supported the Chinese nationalists in the Chinese Civil War. The Communists won the war, and the Chinese nationalists fled the Chinese mainland, and they established a small Chinese state in Taiwan. For a while the United States recognised Taiwan as China.

Map USA, Soviet Union and China

2 Map USA Russia and China.JPG


But the Soviets and the Chinese were also competing with each other in Asia after WW2, and the Chinese were very unhappy with the strong Soviet military presence in the oil rich countries of Central Asia, and also in Mongolia, which they perceived as a threat. Very often the Russians and the Chinese would support rival communist parties or groups in third world countries i.e. Angola, Mozambique, Somalia, Ethiopia, and Zimbabwe. See Russia VS China, and the Sino-Soviet Split.

The Chinese and the Soviets jointly fought the Americans in Vietnam and the Korean Wars, but the Chinese and the Americans jointly fought the Soviets in Afghanistan.

Gradually, the Americans and the Chinese managed to improve their relations. The Soviet threat was what actually brought the two countries closer. From 1979 onwards, the American companies started investing in China, transforming Communist China from a poor agricultural economy to the factory of the world.

The benefit for the Americans was that they were dragging China away from the Soviets and closer to United States. Moreover the American consumers started enjoying very cheap goods, which were made in China, from very cheap Chinese workers. However for these Chinese workers even these low salaries represented a dramatic increase in their standards of living. Extreme poverty was reduced by almost 70% in the period 1981 to 2009. But many manufacturing jobs were transferred from Western Europe and United States to China. See “The Socialist Myth of Economic Bubbles”.


Image Extreme Poverty Rates

3 Extreme Poverty.JPG

While the Americans were trying to drag China closer to them and away from the Soviets, the Russians were not wasting their time either. The KGB was preparing the demolition of the Soviet Union, in order to export the vast Russian oil and natural gas reserves to the big industrial economies of Western Europe i.e. Germany, France, Italy, Netherlands, United Kingdom and Spain. These energy flows would generate billions of dollars in export revenue for Russia, while at the same time they would increase Russia’s influence in Western Europe. The Russians also expected the Europeans to invest and build their factories in Russia, in order to take advantage of the cheap Russian labour (build your factories in Russia instead of China).

Therefore the world was moving towards a new geopolitical landscape, with China moving away from the Soviet Union and closer to USA, while the European Union was moving away from the United States and closer to Russia. Ronald Reagan tried to prevent the energy connection of Europe and Russia, but the German industry was very hungry for the Russian oil and gas.

Map China moves closer to America while Europe moves closer to Russia

4 Map USA Russia and China


5 World Map.JPG

The KGB Breaks the Soviet Union

It is very naïve to assume that the Soviet Union fall because of its economic problems, or because of the poverty of its people. The Soviet Union was run by KGB, and it still is. The Soviet Union had tremendous powers to terrorize the Soviet population. Nobody would dare to openly criticize the Communist Party.

Look at what happens in North Korea, which is a Communist country of 25 million inhabitants, with a GDP of only 40 billion dollars. And yet nobody dares to complain, because the Communist Party will execute them if they dare to do so. The KGB had a lot more power than North Korea in terrorizing its population.

Picture Kim Jong Un, Dictator of North Korea and Grand Son of the founder of the North Korean Communist Party (Kim Il Sung)

6 Kim Jong Un

Revolutions occur when a foreign country is using the domestic Communist Party to attack this country’s army. Before WW1 the German Empire, the Austrian Empire and the Ottoman Empire, supported the Russian Communist Party in order to defeat Russia in WW1. See “Zionists VS Bolsheviks : The Good and the Bad Jews of Churchill and Stalin”.

In the Soviet Union the Communist Party was already running the country, and therefore no foreign country could finance the Communist Party to attack the country. And China was a weaker country than the Soviet Union and could not support some Communist Party and defeat the Russian Army.

The Islamists of the Persian Gulf could cause some turmoil in the Muslim Colonies of the Soviet Union in the Caspian Sea and Central Asia i.e. Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan etc., because the Communists almost prohibited Islam.

The Pope could also cause some problems in Poland, a religious Catholic country, but Poland was not a member of the Soviet Union anyway.

Therefore it is ridiculous to believe that the KGB could not hold the Soviet Union together, if the Russians were not interested to export their oil and gas to Europe, increasing Russia’s influence over Europe, while generating billions in hard currency from these exports. The Russian friendly “assault” on Europe would follow the American friendly “assault” on China.

Remember that the KGB was controlling 100% of the Soviet economy. To mobilize a crowd you need to be able to provide it with information and propaganda, and of course some financial support, armaments etc. Look at what happens in USA today, where the Russians, the Chinese, the Mexicans, the Islamists etc, they all have their partners in USA, and they are attacking the American government with propaganda.

Iran, Venezuela, Cuba, Bolivia and Hezbollah are controlling the drug cartels of Latin America and they finance the American gangs of United States. Moreover the Arabs of the Gulf and the Chinese have great influence over the American Academia, Hollywood and journalism. All of them are able to launch assaults on the American governments, both through the media, but also in the streets.

But they can do it because they USA has an open economy and a free society, and these countries can easily buy American academics, journalists and actors, in order to promote their interests in United States. But in the Soviet Union the KGB was controlling 100% of the economy. To criticize the Communist Party one would need a permit from the party, or he would die.

Also remember that the Europeans were constantly worrying about their oil supplies from the Persian Gulf and North Africa, because a potential war would block their imports and freeze their energy hungry economies. Therefore they saw the Russian supplies as a lot more reliable, and also cheaper in terms of transport costs. And of course it was the Soviet Union that supported counties like Egypt, Syria and Iraq, countries that were fighting the NATO allies i.e. Saudi Arabia, Israel etc.

The Ruthless KGB Leader

Those who doubt that the KGB broke the Soviet Union, they should take into account that Michael Gorbachev, the last leader of the Soviet Union and the man who broke the Soviet Union, was handpicked by Yuri Andropov, the most ruthless KGB leader. Yuri Andropov was also the longest serving, the most educated and the most effective leader of KGB (1967-1982), and after KGB he became the leader of the Soviet Union in 1982, till his death in 1984.

Already from 1980 Yuri Andropov was promoting the “reformer” Michael Gorbachev, and he chose him as his successor when he became leader of the Soviet Union. Gorbachev had to wait a year after Andropov’s death before becoming leader of the Soviet Union.

For Andropov and Gorbachev see the following articles

Wikipedia “Yuri Andropov : Promotion of Gorbachev”

From 1980 to 1982, while still chairman of the KGB, Andropov opposed plans to occupy Poland after the emergence of the Solidarity movement and promoted reform-minded party cadres including Mikhail Gorbachev.[7] Andropov was the longest-serving KGB chairman and did not resign as head of the KGB until May 1982, when he was again promoted to the Secretariat to succeed Mikhail Suslov as secretary responsible for ideological affairs.


“Ex-K.G.B. Chief Says Andropov Supported Purges”

13 Paragraph

During his 15 months as Soviet leader, in which he began an anti-corruption drive, he promoted Mr. Gorbachev’s career. Soviet insiders say he wanted Mr. Gorbachev, then agricultural secretary, to succeed him.


“Who is Mikhail Gorbachev? Former leader of the Soviet Union who helped end the Cold War and Nobel Prize winner”, Ιανουάριος 2017

10, 11, 12, 13 Paragraphs

In 1980 he was promoted to the Soviet Union’s all-powerful executive committee, the Politburo.

He was a protege of Soviet leader Yuri Andropov and helped him begin much-needed reforms.

Andropov picked him as his successor when he died, but he had to wait until another ageing leader Constantin Chernenko also died before he could rise to the very top.

In 1985 he was elected general secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union – effectively the ruler of the USSR and the whole Soviet bloc.

Yuri Andropov was behind the hijackings of the Western airliners. Andropov was also behind the assassination attempt against Pope Jean Paul B. The assassin was a member of the Turkish nationalist organization Grey Wolves, and according to the CIA behind the attack was KGB and Yuri Andropov. The reason was that the Pope was an anticommunist, he was Polish, and he was financing the anti-Communist movement in Poland, when the Polish people were trying to overturn their puppet government which was imposed on them by the Soviets.

Yuri Andropov was also the man who personally oversaw the revival of anti-Semitism in the post-war Europe, after Israel won Egypt in the war of 1967. After the Holocaust anti-Semitism was very weak in Europe. Under Andropov’s leadership, the KGB translated and distributed thousands of copies of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion to the Muslim world, in order to mobilize the Soviet allies against Israel, which was the most reliable American ally since the early 1960s. It was this man who spread anti-Semitism in Europe, in order to discredit the United States in the eyes of the European people, by presenting the United States as a part of a Jewish conspiracy. Today Russia and Israel are allies against Turkey and Qatar, and the centre of European anti-Semitism has moved to the Russian rivals i.e. France, Sweden, Poland etc.

For more details on Yuri Andropov and KGB see “Disinformation”

KGB Propaganda

So it was this man, Yuri Andropov, who picked the reformer Michael Gorbachev as his successor. Wouldn’t it be naïve to believe that the KGB was not preparing the break up of the Soviet Union since 1980? By breaking the Soviet Union the Russians left the rich in oil Central Asia to China. Central Asia was a thorn in the Russo-Chinese relations during the 20th Century.

By breaking the Soviet Union the Russians also left Azerbaijan to Turkey and Iran, since Caucasus was a thorn in the Russo-Turkish and Russo-Iranian relations during the previous centuries. Note that the Russians had discovered the rich oil and gas reserves of Western Siberia, and they were no longer dependent on Baku, as it was the case during the World Wars of the 20th Centuries.


8 World Map.JPG

The Russians also relaxed their grip on Poland, Hungary, and Czechoslovakia, and allowed them to operate like cushions between Russia and Western Europe. And obviously the Russians were not happy at all when these countries were absorbed by NATO in 1999 (Poland, Hungary, Check Republic), and in 2004 (Bulgaria, Romania, Slovakia, Lithuania, Estonia, Latvia).

According to the Russians the Americans had promised them that NATO would not absorb these countries. The Americans do not accept the Russian claims. The Russians were even more dissatisfied when they saw that NATO was using Georgia and Ukraine, two Soviet members, to hurt vital Russian interests. And the same was true for Syria.

If we want to be fair we must say that Russia is a mafia state run by KGB, but we must also admit that the West was very disrespectful towards Russia after the demise of the Soviet Union. When you know that the KGB broke the Soviet Union to export the Russian oil and gas, and you threaten these exports by using ex Russian allies or satelites i.e. Syria, Ukraine, Georgia, then you are looking for trouble.


Map Qatar-Turkey and White Stream Pipeline

9 Pipelinestan.JPG

Reversing the Tide

Today we see once more the reversing of the above geopolitical landscape. Now the United States is afraid of China, and the Europeans are afraid of Russia. By promoting the natural gas of the Muslim Brotherhood (Qatar-Iran-Turkmenistan-Kazakstan) to Europe, as the French, the Polish, the Swedish and others wanted, the Americans were pushing Russia towards China’s arms. And if the United States had to fight Russia and China, it would make sense for Germany to join this alliance, and that’s how that would look for the United States. It is a bit ugly. Of course the United States would have France, UK, India, Japan. But it still looks ugly in the Pacific Ocean.

Map (Germany-Russia-China) VS USA

10 World War 3.JPG

Now Trump is proposing to Russia to take Syria, to China to take Iran, and to both of them to leave Iraq for the United States.


11 Obama VS Trump

That’s good for the Russians, because Syria and Israel will block the natural gas of Middle East from exiting to the Mediterranean Sea. And Russia would not be very happy to have a Chinese Empire at its south. China already has Pakistan and Iran, and Iran has Syria, and if Iran takes Iraq, as China would wish it did, China would exit to the Mediterranean Sea through satellites.

Map The New Chinese Empire

12 Map Chinese Empire.JPG

And obviously the French, the British, the Poles, the Swedish etc, are not feeling very comfortable with the United States having friendly relations with Russia, because it is Russia and not China they are afraid of.

The French elections of April and May 2017 will be very important, because we have to see how France will respond to this new geopolitical landscape, and whether France will decide to break the European Union and go for one to one relations with USA, Russia and China.

France can stop bothering Russia in Syria, focusing on the uranium, oil and natural gas of North Africa (Niger, Chad, Algeria), without threatening of course the Russian exports to Europe. And at the same time France can demand from China and Iran to stop bothering her in North Africa, where they are fighting France for the uranium of Niger and Chad. In return France could import Iranian oil and not support the Americans against China.



“The Obama and the Trump Doctrines”

“Russia VS China”

“USA, Russia and China in the Middle East”

“Disinformation”, Ion Pacepa

Disinformation: Former Spy Chief Reveals Secret Strategies for Undermining Freedom, Attacking Religion, and Promoting Terrorism Hardcover – June 25, 2013

“Pope John Paul II : Assassination Attempts and Plots”

As he entered St. Peter’s Square to address an audience on 13 May 1981,[209] Pope John Paul II was shot and critically wounded by Mehmet Ali Ağca,[16][84][210] an expert Turkish gunman who was a member of the militant fascist group Grey Wolves.[211] The assassin used a Browning 9 mm semi-automatic pistol,[212] shooting the pope in the abdomen and perforating his colon and small intestine multiple times.[79] John Paul II was rushed into the Vatican complex and then to the Gemelli Hospital. On the way to the hospital, he lost consciousness. Even though the two bullets missed his mesenteric artery and abdominal aorta, he lost nearly three-quarters of his blood. He underwent five hours of surgery to treat his wounds.[213] Surgeons performed a colostomy, temporarily rerouting the upper part of the large intestine to let the damaged lower part heal.[213] When he briefly regained consciousness before being operated on, he instructed the doctors not to remove his Brown Scapular during the operation.[214] One of the few people allowed in to see him at the Gemelli Clinic was one of his closest friends philosopher Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka, who arrived on Saturday 16 May and kept him company while he recovered from emergency surgery.[70] The pope later stated that Our Lady of Fátima helped keep him alive throughout his ordeal.

Small marble tablet in St. Peter’s Square indicating where the shooting of John Paul II occurred. The tablet bears John Paul’s personal papal arms and the date of the shooting in Roman numerals.

Could I forget that the event in St. Peter’s Square took place on the day and at the hour when the first appearance of the Mother of Christ to the poor little peasants has been remembered for over sixty years at Fátima, Portugal? For in everything that happened to me on that very day, I felt that extraordinary motherly protection and care, which turned out to be stronger than the deadly bullet.[216]

Ağca was caught and restrained by a nun and other bystanders until police arrived. He was sentenced to life imprisonment. Two days after Christmas in 1983, John Paul II visited Ağca in prison. John Paul II and Ağca spoke privately for about twenty minutes.[84][210] John Paul II said, “What we talked about will have to remain a secret between him and me. I spoke to him as a brother whom I have pardoned and who has my complete trust.″

On 2 March 2006 the Italian parliament’s Mitrokhin Commission, set up by Silvio Berlusconi and headed by Forza Italia senator Paolo Guzzanti, concluded that the Soviet Union was behind the attempt on John Paul II’s life,[211][217] in retaliation for the pope’s support of Solidarity, the Catholic, pro-democratic Polish workers’ movement, a theory that had already been supported by Michael Ledeen and the United States Central Intelligence Agencyat the time.[211][217] The Italian report stated that Communist Bulgarian security departments were utilised to prevent the Soviet Union’s role from being uncovered.[217] The report stated that Soviet military intelligence (Glavnoje Razvedyvatel’noje Upravlenije), not the KGB, were responsible.[217] Russian Foreign Intelligence Service spokesman Boris Labusov called the accusation “absurd”.[217] The pope declared during a May 2002 visit to Bulgaria that the country’s Soviet-bloc-era leadership had nothing to do with the assassination attempt.[211][217] However, his secretary, Cardinal Stanisław Dziwisz, alleged in his book A Life with Karol, that the pope was convinced privately that the former Soviet Union was behind the attack.[218] It was later discovered that many of John Paul II’s aides had foreign-government attachments;[219] Bulgaria and Russia disputed the Italian commission’s conclusions, pointing out that the pope had publicly denied the Bulgarian connection.


“Pope John Paul II assassination attempt”

8, 9, 10, 11, 12 Paragraphs

KGB Director Yuri Andropov was convinced that Pope John Paul II’s election was the product of an Anglo-German conspiracy orchestrated by Zbigniew Brzezinski to undermine Soviet hegemony in largely Catholic Poland and ultimately to precipitate the collapse of the entire Soviet Union. The Pope’s announcement of a pilgrimage to Warsaw fueled Andropov’s apprehension, with Andropov issuing a secret memorandum to Soviet schoolteachers:[14]

The Pope is our enemy…. Due to his uncommon skills and great sense of humor he is dangerous, because he charms everyone, especially journalists. Besides, he goes for cheap gestures in his relations with the crowd, for instance, [he] puts on a highlander’s hat, shakes all hands, kisses children, etc…. It is modeled on American presidential campaigns…. Because of the activities of the Church inPoland our activities designed to atheize the youth not only cannot diminish but must intensely develop…. In this respect all means are allowed and we cannot afford sentiments.[14]

Ali Ağca had made several trips to Sofia, Bulgaria. He also claimed to have had contacts with a Bulgarian agent in Rome whose cover was the Bulgarian national airline office. Soon after the shooting, Sergei Antonov, a Bulgarian working in Rome for Balkan Air, was arrested based on Ağca’s testimony and accused of being the Bulgarian agent who masterminded the plot.[citation needed] In 1986, after a three-year trial, he was found not guilty. According to the CIA’s chief of staff in Turkey, Paul Henze, Ağca later stated that in Sofia, he was once approached by the Bulgarian Secret Service and Turkish mafiosi, who offered him three million German marks to assassinate the Pope.[15]

American journalist Arnaud de Borchgrave claimed that the Bulgarians chose Ağca to supply themselves with plausible deniability; choosing a member of the Grey Wolves that had allegedly been involved with the local KGB in drug smuggling routes through Bulgaria to Western Europe would distance themselves because of the implausibility of the link.[16]

Some people, notably Edward S. Herman, co-author with Frank Brodhead of The Rise and Fall of the Bulgarian Connection (1986), and Michael Parenti, felt Ağca’s story was dubious, noting that Ağca made no claims of Bulgarian involvement until he had been isolated in solitary confinement and visited by Italian Military Intelligence (SISMI) agents. On 25 September 1991, former CIA analyst Melvin A. Goodman (now Senior Fellow at the Center for International Policy) revealed that his colleagues, following hierarchical orders, had falsified their analysis to support the accusation. He declared to the US Senate intelligence committee that “the CIA hadn’t any proof” concerning this alleged “Bulgarian connection”.[17][18] Neither the Severino Santiapichi court nor the investigation by judge Franco Ionta found evidence that SISMI planted Ağca’s story. A French lawyer, Christian Roulette, who authored books blaming Western intelligence agencies for the assassination attempt, testified in court that the documentary evidence he referred to actually did not exist.



Aljazeera VS Donald Trump


According to Aljazeera, the socialist news network that belongs to the Emir of Qatar, and which is also the largest network of the Muslim Brotherhood, the Sunnis of Syria must not thank Donald Trump for his attack on Assad’s air base. See Aljazeera “Syrians should not be thanking Trump for the strikes”, April 2017.

First because the attack was minor, second because the Americans have notified the Russians about the attack before hand, third because Assad’s removal is not a priority of the Trump administration, and fourth because Putin’s and Trump’s problem in Syria is Iran and not Assad. Aljazeera also accuses Russia for her cooperation with Israel.

The ambition of the Qataris is to overturn Assad in order to promote the Muslim Brotherhood pipeline i.e. Qatar-Turkey. The ambition of Iran is to block the Qatar-Turkey-Europe pipeline, and to reach the Mediterranean Sea i.e. Iran-Iraq-Syria pipeline, and maybe in the future to also promote the Iran-Turkey-Europe natural gas pipeline. Russia’s ambition is to block both the Qatar-Turkey-Europe and the Iran-Turkey-Europe pipeline. The Obama’s administration ambition was to promote a single pipeline for the Muslim Brotherhood i.e. (Qatar+Iran)-Saudi Arabia-Jordan-Turkey-Europe pipeline, by helping the Muslim Brotherhood, which is supported by Turkey, Qatar and Iran, to overturn the Saudi and the Jordanian King.

You can see that even though Qatar and Iran have very different interests, they are together against Donald Trump, because Donald Trump’s ambition is to leave Syria to Russia i.e. the Qatar-Turkey pipeline dies, and in return ask Russia to leave Iraq to the United States, i.e. the Iran-Iraq-Syria pipeline dies.

Iran and Qatar hope to receive support from France and China, two countries which are also hurt by the USA-Russia détente.

Map Oil and Gas Reserves and Pipelines


Syrians should not be thanking Trump for the strikes


Map Erbil-Ceyhan PipelineJPG

Map Gazprom Pipelines

White Stream Pipeline

Map Kurdistan Pipelines

Map Shareholders of TAP

Possible IS State 1


Χάρτης Αγωγοί Νότιας Ευρώπης

Saudi Sudan Pipeline

The Obama and the Trump Doctrines

The Obama and the Trump Doctrine

On the 7th of April 2017 the American President Donald Trump ordered the attack of a Syrian airbase, which was controlled by forces of the Syrian government (Bashar al-Assad). I believe that on its own the attack does not say much, because it is normal to expect the Russians to offer more space to Syria to the Trump administration, compared to what they did with the Obama administration, and what they would do with a Clinton administration.

The Trump doctrine is much friendlier towards Russia, while both the Obama and the Clinton doctrine were pushing very aggressively the natural gas of the Muslim Brotherhood. At the following maps you can see the Obama and the Trump doctrine.

Obama, the leftist son of an anti-American Shiite Muslim from Kenya, saw the Muslim Brotherhood very positively, and he supported the Muslim Brotherhood, hoping that Iran and Qatar could jointly send their natural gas to Europe and India through Turkey and Pakistan. The ideology of the Muslim Brotherhood is Communism with a God (Allah). With the Obama Doctrine there would be a united Muslim front against Russia in the Middle East.


Image The Obama Doctrine – The Axis of the Muslim Brotherhood Natural Gas

Τραμπ Πούτιν.JPG

Image 2 The Obama Doctrine – The Muslim Brotherhood Natural Gas Goes to Europe and India

Obama Doctrine.jpg

Donald Trump on the other hand believes that the West should help Russia to promote her natural gas exports to the American allies i.e. the E.U., India, Japan and South Korea, in order to break the Russian-China axis. After all Russia and China have competing interests too. See “Russia VS China”.

Image The Trump Doctrine

US Russian Cooperation.JPG

Or at least Trump hopes to weaken the Russia-China axis, if not break it, since Russia sells a lot of oil to China. But what is for sure is that the more the United States and the EU support the Muslim Brotherhood, the more they push Russia towards China, and as a result the United States will have to face a Russo-Chinese bloc in the Pacific Ocean.

The Trump doctrine is that the United States should stop promoting the natural gas of the Muslim Brotherhood in Syria i.e. the Qatar-Turkey pipeline, and leave Syria to Russia, and in return ask from Russia to stop supporting China and Iran against the United States in Iraq.

People are killing each other for centuries for the commercial corridor that connects the Persian Gulf to the Mediterranean Sea i.e. today’s Iraq, Jordan, Israel, Syria, Lebanon. This is the corridor the British and the French gained from the Ottomans during the First World War (1914-1918). Obviously Trump would be very happy if the United States was controlling Syria, but if you want to throw Russia out of traditional spheres of influence i.e. Syria and Ukraine, you cannot expect the Russians to be happy. You should expect them to respond.

Image Map The Iraq-Syria Corridor

Χάρτης Συρίας Ιράκ.JPG

Interpreting the Trump Attack

Therefore the Trump doctrine is much better than the Obama doctrine for both the United States and Russia, and as a result the Russians will be willing to share control of Syria with the Trump administration, as long as the vital Russian interests are not hurt. That’s why Trump can be bolder in Syria compared to Obama, when he wants to attack ISIS, Iran and Hezbollah in Syria. The Russians will even allow the Trump government to be somewhat more aggressive towards the Assad government. Also remember that ISIS are the ex people of Saddam Hussein, who were trained by the KGB and were given oil fields by the Assad regime in Syria.

It is Al-Qaeda who fights Assad in Syria and not ISIS. Before the Arab Spring Al-Qaeda was trained and supported by Iran and Hezbollah, but after the Arab Spring in Syria the Syrian Al-Qaeda changed her name, cut relations with central Al-Qaeda, and started receiving support from the Arabs of the Gulf i.e. Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait etc, and also from the Turks. See “How Putin and Assad Created the Islamic State”.

See also “The Architects of Al-Qaeda and ISIS”

The countries that mainly supported attacks against the Assad regime in the previous years were France, Turkey, and the Arabs, and that’s why ISIS carried out terrorist attacks against France, Turkey and Saudi Arabia. But it is also true that the Turks were also helping ISIS against the Kurds in Syria, and also it is true that the Arabs were helping ISIS against the Shiite militias in Iraq.

Under Obama the United States was only attacking ISIS, but not the Assad regime, because Obama did not want to hurt his alliance with Iran by attacking Assad, a strong Iranian ally. Remember that in the Obama doctrine both Qatar and Iran would use the gas field they share, which is the largest gas field in the world i.e. the South Pars/North Fields, in order to supply Europe and India with natural gas through Turkey and Pakistan.

Image 2 The Obama Doctrine – The Muslim Brotherhood Natural Gas to Europe and India

Obama Doctrine

Image The War for the Pipelines

Map Oil and Gas Reserves and Pipelines.JPG

Image Qatar-Turkey

Possible IS State 1.jpg

Image The War in Afghanistan and Georgia


Therefore I believe that for the moment we should see the Trump attack on Assad as a proof that Donald Trump is willing to support their traditional allies, i.e. Turkey, Israel and the Arabs of the Gulf, and not as a proof that Trump has changed his mind and now he is willing to promote the natural gas of the Muslim Brotherhood. As long at Trump does not change his doctrine, and as long as he does not promote the natural gas of the Muslim Brotherhood, his attacks in Syria will hurt more ISIS, Iran and Hezbollah and a lot less Russia. So what matters is not whether Trump carries an attack against the allies of Russia, but whether he moves away from his doctrine, and closer to the Obama doctrine. That’s what will determine how forceful the Russian response will be, because in Syria every player has different interests.

Also note that last week Trump met with the Egyptian dictator al-Sisi, who has imprisoned the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt was supported by Turkey, Qatar and Iran, with the blessings of Obama and Clinton, and the Muslim Brotherhood’s largest tv channel is the socialist anti-American Aljazeera, which is owned by the Emir of Qatar.

Donald Trump on the other hand praised the Egyptian President, whom he calls a fantastic guy, and he is not very friendly towards Qatar, a country which heavily bet on the election of Hilary Clinton. And Trump is hostile towards Iran. And if Iran keeps attacking the United States in Iraq Donald Trump might even decide to attack Iran. Probably he would not dare to invade Iran, because there would be a war with Russia and China, but he could order a limited attack against the Iranian nuclear facilities.

Also note that Iraq is not just about oil for the United States, as the Communists and the Islamists are saying in the United States. After the 9/11 attack the United States had to move its military bases from Saudi Arabia to Qatar. But Qatar also sees China as the future importer of its gas, even though Qatar needs the military presence of the United States, as a protection against the Saudis and the Iranians. Remember that the Chinese have stronger ties with the Iranians than with the Arabs, both due to the traditional alliance between the Arabs of the Gulf and NATO, but also due to geographical reasons i.e. China can connect to Iran avoiding the sea and the American navy, but she cannot do that with the Arabs of the Gulf.

Therefore you should not see Trump’s obsession with Iraq only in terms of Iraq’s oil reserves. The Americans overturned the Sunni minority of Saddam Hussein, which became Al-Qaeda of Iraq, and later the Islamic State of Iraq, in order to empower the Shia majority of Iraq and the Kurds of Iraq, both of whom were suppressed by the Saddam regime.

The Weakness of the Trump Doctrine

During the Cold War things were quite simple for NATO. NATO was protecting the oil of the Persian Gulf and North Africa from the Soviets, and the rich in oil Soviets were using their allies to make life hard for NATO. Even China was cooperating more with the US than the Soviets after 1980, and the American companies went to China, and transformed China from a poor agricultural economy to the factory of the world.

But now the big threat for the Americans is no longer Russia but China, while the Europeans are still afraid of their neighbouring Russia and much less of China. That’s why Trump says that NATO is obsolete and he is wondering why the United States is not leaving Syria to Russia, instead of promoting the natural gas of the Muslim Brotherhood, a policy that pushes Russia towards China.

Map China and Russia Against the United States

Russia and China Against the US.JPG

But that does not mean that the Trump doctrine is based on the assumption that Russia will align herself with the United States against China, if the US helps Russia to export her gas to the EU, India, Japan and South Korea. The Trump doctrine is based on the assumption that the US will become stronger, and will be able to fight China in the future, irrespective of what Russia does.

But obviously by stop promoting the Muslim Brotherhood, which is designated as a terrorist organization in Russia, Trump hopes that Russia will be at least neutral towards China and the US. Remember that Obama supported the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, and he would probably be very happy if the Muslim Brotherhood overturned the Sauds in Saudi Arabia with the help of Turkey, Iran and Qatar. The Muslim Brotherhood ideology i.e. Socialism and Islam, is very close to Obama’s ideology.

The main weakness of the Trump doctrine is that it hurts some traditional American allies for example Qatar, France and Poland. If Trump helps Russia exports her gas to India, Japan and South Korea, which are all US allies, the Qatari exports will be deeply hurt, because these countries, together with China, absorb the Qatari production.

Moreover, France is hurt by Trump’s effort for an American-Russian détente. France left NATO in 1966, and went back to NATO 33 years later, because she wanted to play the Soviets against the Americans. The French were complaining that the Americans were prioritising their relationship with the British. But now, if the United States approaches Russia, bypassing France, which was the middle man, France’s geopolitical significance will be significantly reduced, given that the Americans have close ties with the British, and the Russians have close ties with the Germans, who are by far Russia’s best customer in oil and gas.

Map The Geopolitical Problem of France

Map The Problem of France.JPG

France will have the option to approach China, in order to play the Americans against the Chinese, but China is far away to help France in case of a war. Moreover China and Iran are competing with France for the uranium of Northern Africa i.e. Niger, Chad. France desperately needs this uranium because the country is dependent on energy produced from nuclear factories. Germany decided to close her nuclear factories after the Fukushima nuclear disaster of Japan in 2011, and replace nuclear energy with Russian natural gas. But obviously France would prefer not to be dependent on Russian natural gas imports, which would come through Germany, because that would make France dependent on Germany and Russia, which would not be good for France in case of a war.

Obviously the French and the British would prefer to import oil and natural gas from Africa (Trans-Saharan Pipeline) and the Middle East (Qatar-Turkey and Turkmenistan-Europe pipelines), instead of being dependent on Russia. But to do that you go to a war with Russia, because most of Russian export revenues come from sales of oil and natural gas to Europe. After all the reason the Russians dropped the Soviet Union was to export their oil and gas to the large industrial economies of Europe i.e. Germany, France, Great Britain and Italy.

Map France and United Kingdom

France and Britain.JPG

Another problem of the Trump doctrine is that he wants to reverse the large trade deficits that the United States runs with China, and many American multinationals are based in China. And the same is true for Mexico. These American companies export their products to the United States, and China and Mexico put pressure on them in order to spread her propaganda against Trump.

Look at what happens with the New York Times, which promotes the interests of the Mexican industrialists, and how biased the paper is towards Trump. Carlo Slim, the Mexican socialist industrialist who is supported by the Mexican government, is the largest shareholder of the New York Times.

All the above does not mean that Trump wants to go to a war with China. That’s the last thing Trump wants. Trump wants China to leave Iraq to the American sphere of influence. For China it would be great if Iran takes control of Iraq, because Iran already has Syria. And Pakistan is a strong Chinese ally, and that would bring China to the Mediterranean Sea, taking also control of the Persian Gulf. That would not be good for Russia either.

Map The New Soviet Union (China)

China's' New Empire.JPG

Trump would like China to have Iran and Pakistan in her sphere of influence, in order for China to have access to oil and natural gas by land, which would help China to stop converting the South China Sea to a Chinese lake. And as I said Trump expects China to leave Iraq to the US, and the US to leave Syria to Russia.

Map USA-Russia-China

Trump Doctrine.JPG

Remember that the First World War, and also the Second, happened because Germany was threatening the British, the French and the Russian to reach the Persian Gulf and the Caspian See through her allies the Ottomans (Turks) and the Austrians. Now China is threatening to do the same through her allies Pakistan and Iran.


Map WW1 and WW2


Map WW1

Map of World War 1.JPG

Image South Energy Corridor

Map Shareholders of TAP.JPG

Map The Russian Pipelines

Map Gazprom Pipelines.JPG

Map Kurdistan

Map Kurdistan Pipelines

Map The White Pipeline and the War in Ukraine and Georgia

White Stream Pipeline.JPG

Map Turkey VS Russia

Map Erbil-Ceyhan PipelineJPG


Zionists VS Bolsheviks : The Good and the Bad Jews of Churchill and Lenin

Before the creation of Israel in 1948, there was a Jewish civil war in Palestine, with the majority of the Palestinian Jews supporting Great Britain (Haganah), and a minority of the Palestinian Jews, mainly Communist Jews, supporting the Russians. Maybe a few of them were even working of the Italian fascists.

The Jews who were working for the Russians (Soviets) were carrying terrorist attacks against the British, who at the time had Palestine under British control. These Jews were hunted, and very often executed or deported from Palestine, by the British and their Jewish allies (Haganah).

In 1917 the British had promised to create a Jewish state in Palestine (Balfour Declaration), among other things because there were many Russian Jews in the Russian Communist Party, and the British were hoping that they would give the Russian Jews of the Communist Party an incentive to use their influence, in order to keep Russia in WW1 against Germany (1914-1918).

But it was the Germans who had brought the Russian Communists in power, in order to attack the Russian Army, and the Russian Communists, both Jews and no-Jews, were not very interested in helping the British when they rose to power in 1917.

Instead, the Russian Communists withdrew Russia from WW1, they gave many Russian territories to the Germans, the Austrians and the Ottomans, in exchange for their support against the Russian army, and they also made public the secret agreements between the British the French and the Russians, about how they planned to split the Ottoman colonies of the Middle East in case the won the war.

The architect of the October (Bolshevik) Revolution was the German Foreign Minister Arthur Zimmerman. Arthur Zimmerman was also the architect of the Irish (Easter Rising) and Indian (Hindu-German Conspiracy) revolts against the British. See Wikipedia “Arthur Zimmermann”.

Image Arthur Zimmermann: The Architect of the October (Bolshevik) Revolution in 1917

Arthur Zimmerman

Map October (Bolshevik) Revolution 1917 : Germany-Austria-Turkey-Russian Communist Party (green) against England-France-Russian Empires (purple)

Map October Revolution.JPG

You can see on the map that the Germans and their Communist allies had a clear geographical advantage against the Russian army, because the Brits and the French could only support the Russian army through the Middle East.

Lenin and Stalin were not using the Communist Jews only against the British in Palestine. There were many Russian Jews who had fled Russia before the Bolshevik Revolution, hunted by the Russian Tsar, and they ended up in Germany, UK, the United States and elsewhere. And some of them were Communists, and when they rose to power Lenin and Stalin were using these Communists Jews to undermine Germany, England and the United States.

In 1920, Henry Ford, the greatest American industrialist at the time, published the International Jew. The International Jew was a variant of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, which had been published by the Tsarist police in the beginning of the 20th Century Russia, when the German, Austrian and Ottoman Empires were using the Russian Communists to undermine the Russian Tsar. Henry Ford was also doing business with Nazi Germany, and Hitler was one of his admirers. See also “Inside Hitler’s Mind”.

It is not true that the Jews were controlling the Communist Party of Russia, but a very large portion of the Russian Jewish population saw Communism positively. It is easier for atheism to appeal to a religious minority (Jews) than to a religious majority (Christians).

At the same time that Henry Ford financed the publishing of the International Jew, Winston Churchill published an article about bad and good Jews, titled “Zionism Versus Bolshevism : A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People”.

Image The Good and the Bad Jews of Winston Churchill 1920

Zionism VS Bolshevism.JPG

The reason Winston Churchill wrote this article was that the Soviets supported Jewish Communists in Great Britain and Palestine, in order to attack the Brits. In Palestine the Germans and the Italians were also supporting the Muslim Brotherhood against the British. See “Hitler’s Alliance with the Muslim Brotherhood”.

Actually the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem organized the Arab Spring of Palestine (1936-1939) against the British, with the support of Mussolini and Hitler. When the British were hunting the Grand Mufti he was hiding in Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany, and he was organizing the Muslim parts of the SS in Bosnia. See Daily Caller “Nazi SS Commander Wished Islamic Leader Success In Fight ‘Against The Jewish Invaders”, March 2017

The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem was also the man who convinced Hitler to end his policy of allowing the Jews of the countries he conquered to flee, because they ended up in Palestine. And Hitler followed the advice of the Grand Mufti and implemented the Final Solution. See “Netanyahu, Hitler and the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem”.

But let me go back to 1920. While in the United States Henry Ford was financing the International Jew, Winston Churchill wrote “Zionism VS Bolshevism”, with a part of it titled “Good and Bad Jews”. Churchill called “good Jews” the nationalist Jews (Zionists), who were the allies of Great Britain, and he called “bad Jews” the international Jews (Bolsheviks), who were the allies of Lenin and Stalin. See “Good and Bad Jews”, 1920

With the Arab Spring that started in the 21st Century, the French started fighting in Syria with the Russians, the Syrians and the Iranians, because the French, the Turks and the Arabs of the Gulf wanted to overturn Bashar al Assad, in order to advance the Qatar-Turkey pipeline. They were hoping that Turkey, Iran and Qatar would cooperate as a Muslim Brotherhood axis, in order to supply Europe with gas bypassing Russia.

Map The 21st Century War for the Natural Gas Pipelines

Map of Oil and Gas

Israel has aligned itself with Russia against Turkey and Qatar, and the French are using the French Jews as a bargaining chip in order to threat Israel. Obviously the French don’t do that openly, they just live it to their Muslim friends. But Netanyahu replied by saying that French Jews should immigrate to Israel if they are threatened in France. And Putin also said that European Jews can go to Russia if they are threatened in Europe. Putin was not only referring to France, but also to Scandinavia, because the Scandinavian countries are enemies of Russia, and Russia said that if Sweden and Finland join NATO Russia will start WW3. Scandinavia has become the European fortress of anti-Semitism. But besides France and Scandinavia there is also England, where the leader of the opposition i.e. Jeremy Corbyn, is very close to Iran and Venezuela, and the Labour Party has become very anti-Semitic under his leadership.

The French are saying that they do not want the French Jews to leave France, and I believe them. Especially Emannuel Valls who is married to a French Jewish woman. But they certainly want to use them in order to blackmail Israel, in order to help their allies the Arabs, and their new friends Iran. Maybe not Valls, but Valls is only one man. You saw how bad he did in the race for the leadership of the socialist party in 2016.

See Politico “Putin invites Jews to Russia”

See Telegraph “France does not want Jews to leave’ say leaders Hollande and Valls”, February 2015

As you can see at the following map, the largest part of European Jewry lives in France i.e. 580 thousands. France is only third, with the US first (8m) and Israel (6m) second in Jewish populations.

Image World Jewish Population

Πληθυσμός Εβραίων

So there are still good and bad Jews, according to their allies. It is the same with the Kurds. The Kurds are facing the situation faced by the pre-Israel Jews. Some Kurds are allies of the Americans, some of Russia, some of Iran, some of Syria, some of Turkey, and there are good and bad Kurds according to their allies, and how you want to see it. And there is Kurdish civil war.

Map Kurdistan Pipelines.JPG

The problem is that now there are good and bad Jews even in United States. As long as the United States was fighting the Soviets, Israel was America’s best friend, so there were only good Jews in the United States. But now that the Trump administration tries to approach Russia, in order to brake the China-Russia alliance, and Israel has made good with the Russians, the pro-Arab and anti-Russian Americans started talking about bad Jews, in an indirect way of course. On the other hand the Jewish Americans are usually democrats, so they are anti-Trump, and people like Trump start seeing bad and good Jews too. So there are bad and good Jews for both the Democrats i.e. mainly the pro-Russian Jews of Israel, and the Republicans i.e. the anti-Trump American Jews. Now that America is so polarized there will be good and bad Jews in the United States too.

Map Gazprom Pipelines

Map Erbil-Ceyhan PipelineJPG.JPG

Map of The Ottoman Empire 1900

Map of World War 1.JPG

Possible IS State 1.jpg

Χάρτης Gazprom Αγωγοί.jpg

Map Iraq Sunni Shia Kurds.JPG

Map of Iraqi Desert

Map South Energy Corridor

Σαουδική Αραβία.jpg

Τουρκία Σαουδική Αραβία Ιράν

Χάρτης Nabucco

Χάρτης Αφρική - Ευρώπη

Αποθέματα Πετρελαίου ανά Χώρα.JPG

Αποθέματα Φυσικού Αερίου

Ο Χάρτης του Φυσικού Αερίου.JPG


Saudi Sudan Pipeline.JPG

Xin Jiang Pipelines.JPG

Proven Oil Reserves.JPG

Map Oil Gas Pipelines Middle East.JPG

Map of Asian Colonies

Map of Oil and Gas Reserves.JPG

Africa Colonies.JPG


Countries by GDP.JPG

Military Spending

Military Spending

Salt A World History

Russia+China against the US

Trump VS Le Pen 2.JPG

US and Russia Against China

Trump VS Le Pen.JPG

Χάρτης Αγωγοί Νότιας Ευρώπης.JPG


“Nazi SS Commander Wished Islamic Leader Success In Fight ‘Against The Jewish Invaders”, March 2017

The Israel National Library released a rediscovered telegram Wednesday that reveals that notorious Nazi leader Heinrich Himmler wished the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem success in fighting Jews who were migrating to Israel during World War II.

The telegram, dated Nov. 2 1943, shows Heinrich Himmler, the notorious commander of the Nazi Schutzstaffel (or S.S.), offered Grand Mufti Haj Amin al-Husseini “warm wishes” in his continued fight against the Jews. The letter was sent on the anniversary of the Balfour Declaration, which expressed the British government’s support for the establishment of a Jewish homeland in what is now Israel.

“To Grand Mufti Amin al-Husseini: From the outset, the National Socialist [Nazi] movement of Greater Germany has been a standard-bearer in the battle against world Jewry,” said Himmler’s telegram. “For this reason, it is closely following the battle of freedom-seeking Arabs, particularly in Palestine, against the Jewish invaders. The shared recognition of the enemy and the joint fight against it are creating the strong base [uniting] Germany and freedom-seeking Arabs around the world. In this spirit, I am pleased to wish you, on the anniversary of the wretched Balfour Declaration, warm wishes on your continued fight until the great victory.”

Husseini’s connections to Nazi Germany date back to at least the late 1930s, when he traveled to fascist Italy and Germany to avoid a British arrest warrant for his alleged role in the Arab revolt, which lasted from 1936 to 1939. He collaborated with the Nazis in propaganda broadcasts and reportedly aided the S.S. in the recruitment of Bosnian Muslims. Husseini is also known to have met with Adolf Hitler, and requested German support for the liberation of Palestine from the British. He is considered a key historical figure in Palestinian nationalism.

“Netanyahu, Hitler and the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem”

“Arthur Zimmermann”

1st Paragraph

Arthur Zimmermann (5 October 1864 – 6 June 1940) was State Secretary for Foreign Affairs of the German Empire from 22 November 1916 until his resignation on 6 August 1917. His name is associated with the Zimmermann Telegram during World War I. However, he was closely involved in plans to support rebellions in Ireland and in India, and to assist the Bolsheviks to undermine Tsarist Russia.

5th Paragraph

In late 1914 Zimmermann was visited by Roger Casement, the Irish revolutionary. A plan was laid to land 25,000 soldiers in the west of Ireland with 75,000 rifles. However, the German general staff did not agree. In April 1916 Casement returned to Ireland in a U-boat and was captured and executed. A German ship (the Libau) renamed the Aud, flying Norwegian colours, shipped 20,000 rifles to the south Irish coast, but it failed to link up with the rebels and was scuttled. Planning on this support, a minority of the Irish Volunteers launched the Easter Rising inDublin. Though the Rising failed, its political effect led on to the Anglo-Irish war in 1919–22 and the formation of the Irish Free State.

“Inside Hitler’s Mind”


The anti-communist movement in America has long been afflicted by an
historical misunderstanding which persists today. There is a widespread
teaching about communism and its origins which is false. It is a
teaching which has influenced millions of Americans.

The 20th century version of this teaching originated with Russian
anti-Semites. Relying on false documents and a conspiratorial
hypothesis, these anti-Semites blamed Jews and Freemasons for a
wide-ranging global conspiracy to destroy Christianity and create a
world government. One of the key historical facts alleged by these
Russian anti-Semites has to do with the origins of the Bolshevik

In this context, the importance of historical facts and
interpretations should not be underestimated. If our historical facts
are incorrect, then our political understanding will be weak and our
actions will be misdirected. If we believe in enemies and conspiracies
that do not exist in reality, then real conspiracies will be
misapprehended or ignored.

A body of literature and testimony, based on false assertions and
bogus documentation, began to appear in the West after the Bolshevik
Revolution. This literature and testimony asserted (and continues to
assert) that certain American bankers, who happen to have Jewish names,
had financed the Bolshevik Revolution. Once the Russian anti-Semites
planted this poisonous seed, it spread rapidly. Henry Ford was an early
convert to this claim. Hitler and the Nazis were also believers in it.

After the collapse of Nazi Germany, writers and publicists like
Robert Welch, Gary Allen and Anthony Sutton continued to advance the
thesis that a sinister Western group financed and directed the communist
revolution in Russia. This group, it was said, used international
communism to advance their own sinister agenda in the West.

George Knupffer, a Russian emigre, was an early advocate of this
view. As a Russian monarchist, he worked to influence American public
opinion by writing books. Long before the founding of the John Birch
Society by Robert Welch, Knupffer and his compatriots advanced the
theory that Russia had been a testing ground — a preliminary experiment
— used by forces located outside of Russia.

Who was behind this conspiracy?

According to Knupffer, it was the Warburgs and Jacob Schiff of Kuhn,
Loeb & Co. that financed the Bolshevik Revolution. These were the
alleged culprits and villains behind it all. These were the evil
geniuses of the October Revolution. Allen and Sutton followed Knupffer’s
line — which had previously been advanced by Henry Ford’s anti-Semitic
publications of the 1920s and 1930s.

It must be said, in response to this conspiracy theory, that the
allegations against the Warburgs and Schiffs are false. These
allegations, which originate in anti-Semitic propaganda, have been
repeated so often that many good people have come to accept them without

In truth, the culprits behind the communist takeover in Russia were
not in New York, and they did not have Jewish names. The villains were
in Berlin and they had German names. As it happens, the chief architect
of the Bolshevik Revolution was none other than German Foreign Secretary
Arthur Zimmermann. During the First World War the Political Section of
the German Foreign Office had been devising a plan to bring revolution
to Russia. It was Zimmermann’s pet idea. From 1915 to 1917 the German
secret service began cultivating socialists of all parties. Baron
Gisbert von Romberg, the German minister in Switzerland, urged that the
Kaiser put his money behind Lenin and his Bolsheviks. Count Diego von
Bergen, the German official in charge of political subversion within
Russia, believed that a large enough sum of money could bring Lenin to

How much money did the Kaiser provide to Lenin?

The German Social Democrat, Eduard Bernstein, later said that the sum
supplied to Lenin by the Kaiser “was very large, an almost unbelievable
amount, certainly more than 50 million gold marks.”

General Max von Hoffmann, who negotiated the German-Soviet
Brest-Litovsk peace treaty, later confirmed: “Lenin and his comrades
received vast sums of money from the Kaiser’s government for their
destructive agitation.”

In fact, General Hoffmann admitted that he blackmailed Lenin into
signing the Brest-Litovsk treaty, and it is simple to see how this was
done. Since Lenin’s takeover of Russia had been accomplished with help
from German agents and German money while Russia was at war with
Germany, Lenin’s treason was obvious. All the Germans had to do was
publish the truth about their secret alliance with Lenin and the
Bolshevik government would collapse.

Once in power, Lenin did not want to sign the peace treaty with
Germany. But he had no choice. At the Time Kaiser Wilhelm triumphantly
pronounced that Lenin “was finished.” The Kaiser could “out” Lenin at
any time and bring an end to Russia’s Bolsheviks. But Germany
disintegrated later that year and the Kaiser abdicated. The treaty with
Lenin became meaningless.

The blackmail was left unused and later proved to be something of a
scandal and embarrassment for the German military itself.

By a strange quirk of fate, the Bolsheviks broke loose from their
Imperial German sponsors.

Aside from German files and memoirs on the subject, French
counter-intelligence detected and documented collusion between Lenin and
the Kaiser in March 1917. The intelligence service of Russia’s
Provisional Government also uncovered evidence of German-Bolshevik
collusion in July 1917. It was then learned that large sums of money
were being channeled to Lenin’s people in Russia through the Bank of
Siberia in Petrograd. This money was traced back through Scandinavia to
Imperial Germany. Because of this discovery, Lenin had to go underground
to avoid arrest as a German agent.

In preparing its case against Lenin, the Provisional Government
compiled 20 volumes of evidence tying Lenin to German agents and German money.

It is very important that we respect the facts of history. It is even
more important that we avoid building our political ideas around false
historical claims about New York bankers with Jewish names. The origins
of the Marxist revolution in Russia have been documented by an army of
researchers and writers. This work needs to be studied and understood.

We cannot combat the false doctrines of the left with a false
doctrine of the right.

“The International Jew: A Summary of Anti-Semitism in the 20th Century”

“Putin invites Jews to Russia”

“France does not want Jews to leave’ say leaders Hollande and Valls”, February 2015

“The Alliance Between Hitler and the Muslim Brotherhood”

“The International Jew”

1η, 2η, 3η Παράγραφος

The International Jew is a four volume set of booklets or pamphlets published and distributed in the early 1920s by Henry Ford, an American industrialist and automobile manufacturer.

In Spring 1920, Ford made his personal newspaper, The Dearborn Independent, chronicle what he considered the “Jewish menace”. Every week for 91 issues, the paper exposed some sort of Jewish-inspired evil major story in a headline. The most popular and aggressive stories were then chosen to be reprinted into four volumes called The International Jew.[1]

It is to be distinguished from The International Jew: The World’s Problem which was the headline in The Dearborn Independent and is the name of a collection of articles serialized in The Dearborn Independent.

8η, 9η, 10η, 11η Παράγραφος

1927 Libel Suit

A libel lawsuit, brought by San Francisco lawyer and Jewish farm cooperative organizer Aaron Sapiro in response to antisemitic remarks, led Ford to close the Independent in December 1927. News reports at the time quoted him as being shocked by the content and having been unaware of its nature. During the trial, the editor of Ford’s “Own Page”, William John Cameron, testified that Ford had nothing to do with the editorials even though they were under his byline. Cameron testified at the libel trial that he never discussed the content of the pages nor sent them to Ford for his approval.[3] Investigative journalist Max Wallace doubted the veracity of this claim and wrote that James M. Miller, a former Dearborn Independent employee, swore under oath that Ford had told him he intended to expose Sapiro.[4] According to Michael Barkun, “That Cameron would have continued to publish such controversial material without Ford’s explicit instructions seemed unthinkable to those who knew both men. Mrs. Stanley Ruddiman, a Ford family intimate, remarked that “I don’t think Mr. Cameron ever wrote anything for publication without Mr. Ford’s approval”.

Influence on Nazi Anti-Semitism

Ford’s International Jew was translated into German in 1922 and was cited as an influence by Baldur von Schirach, one of the Nazis leaders, who stated “I read it and became anti-Semitic. In those days this book made such a deep impression on my friends and myself because we saw in Henry Ford the representative of success, also the exponent of a progressive social policy. In the poverty-stricken and wretched Germany of the time, youth looked toward America, and apart from the great benefactor, Herbert Hoover, it was Henry Ford who to us representedAmerica.”[6] Ford is the only American mentioned in Hitler’s Mein Kampf, but is only mentioned once in one sentence, where Hitler writes “Every year makes them [American Jews] more and more the controlling masters of the producers in a nation of one hundred and twenty millions; only a single great man, Ford, to their fury still maintains full independence.” The second edition of the book removed reference to Ford.

The Patriotic Publishing Co

In 1934, The Patriotic Publishing Co., an unincorporated entity that operated out of a post office box[8][not in citation given] “Issued” and “Compiled and edited” The Protocols as an expanded 300-page tome. The expansion from less than 100 pages to 300 pages was made possible by copying substantial sections from The Dearborn Independent. Most of the later imprints of the Protocols are derived from this 1934 edition.

George F. Green and the Christian Nationalist Crusade

In June 1949 there appeared a 174-page, one-volume abridgment of the text, titled The International Jew, subtitled “The World’s Foremost Problem”, and edited by George F. Green[10] (who is not to be confused with the novelist and short-story writer of the same name). It was published by Green, editor of The Independent Nationalist [11]

The book was also sold in the United States, where it was distributed by the Christian Nationalist Crusade

“Communist Party of the USA”

The Communist Party of the United States of America (CPUSA) was a Moscow-controlled Marxist-Leninist party in the United States. It nominated a candidate for president from 1924 through 1984, sometimes with funding from the atheistic Communist Soviet Union. With the collapse of the Soviet Union it became a hollow shell and has urged voters to support the Democrat Party.[1]

The Soviet Union used the CPUSA to recruit spies after the U.S. recognized theUSSR in 1933.

The CPUSA was under heavy attack by the U.S. government after 1947 and the start of the Cold War. After gaining control of many Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO) locals and unions it was expelled from the CIO in 1948. After losing its main base it continued to operate some small unions, such as the fur workers. It supported and gained control of the presidential campaign of Henry A. Wallace in 1948. After 1948 it was a hunted target and played only a small role.

Membership in the CPUSA was a high maintenance commitment—the Party demanded full control of people’s ideas, friendships, jobs and activities. There were repeated in-depth investigations, humiliating interrogations, forced confessions, and purges. Many sympathizers (or “fellow travelers”) supported Communist goals but refused to become members. Of those who did join turnover in membership was very high, with most people staying less than a year before they quit in disgust with the intellectual and social regimentation of the party and its structure as a top-down dictatorship that took orders from Moscow. The CPUSA did not execute anyone, but many—probably most—of the American Communists who traveled to Russia were killed there.[2]

Zionism versus Bolshevism.

A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People

By the Rt. Hon. Winston S. Churchill.

SOME people like Jews and some do not; but no thoughtful man can doubt the fact that they are beyond all question the most formidable and the most remarkable race which has ever appeared in the world.

Disraeli, the Jew Prime Minister of England, and Leader of the Conservative Party, who was always true to his race and proud of his origin, said on a well-known occasion: “The Lord deals with the nations as the nations deal with the Jews.” Certainly when we look at the miserable state of Russia, where of all countries in the world the Jews were the most cruelly treated, and contrast it with the fortunes of our own country, which seems to have been so providentially preserved amid the awful perils of these times, we must admit that nothing that has since happened in the history of the world has falsified the truth of Disraeli’s confident assertion.

Good and Bad Jews

The conflict between good and evil which proceeds unceasingly in the breast of man nowhere reaches such an intensity as in the Jewish race. The dual nature of mankind is nowhere more strongly or more terribly exemplified. We owe to the Jews in the Christian revelation a system of ethics which, even if it were entirely separated from the supernatural, would be incomparably the most precious possession of mankind, worth in fact the fruits of all other wisdom and learning put together. On that system and by that faith there has been built out of the wreck of the Roman Empire the whole of our existing civilization.

And it may well be that this same astounding race may at the present time be in the actual process of producing another system of morals and philosophy, as malevolent as Christianity was benevolent, which, if not arrested, would shatter irretrievably all that Christianity has rendered possible. It would almost seem as if the gospel of Christ and the gospel of Antichrist were destined to originate among the same people; and that this mystic and mysterious race had been chosen for the supreme manifestations, both of the divine and the diabolical.

‘National’ Jews

There can be no greater mistake than to attribute to each individual a recognizable share in the qualities which make up the national character. There are all sorts of men — good, bad and, for the most part, indifferent — in every country, and in every race. Nothing is more wrong than to deny to an individual, on account of race or origin, his right to be judged on his personal merits and conduct. In a people of peculiar genius like the Jews, contrasts are more vivid, the extremes are more widely separated, the resulting consequences are more decisive.

At the present fateful period there are three main lines of political conception among the Jews. two of which are helpful and hopeful in a very high degree to humanity, and the third absolutely destructive.

First there are the Jews who, dwelling in every country throughout the world, identify themselves with that country, enter into its national life and, while adhering faithfully to their own religion, regard themselves as citizens in the fullest sense of the State which has received them. Such a Jew living in England would say, “I am an English man practising the Jewish faith.” This is a worthy conception, and useful in the highest degree. We in Great Britain well know that during the great struggle the influence of what may be called the “National Jews” in many lands was cast preponderatingly on the side of the Allies; and in our own Army Jewish soldiers have played a most distinguished part, some rising to the command of armies, others winning the Victoria Cross for valour.

The National Russian Jews, in spite of the disabilities under which they have suffered, have managed to play an honorable and useful part in the national life even of Russia. As bankers and industrialists they have strenuously promoted the development of Russia’s economic resources, and they were foremost in the creation of those remarkable organizations, the Russian Co-operative Societies. In politics their support has been given, for the most part, to liberal and progressive movements, and they have been among the staunchest upholder of friendship with France and Great Britain.

International Jews

In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish effort rise the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.

Terrorist Jews

There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution, by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews, it is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd) or of Krassin or Radek — all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing.

‘Protector of the Jews’

Needless to say, the most intense passions of revenge have been excited in the breasts of the Russian people. Wherever General Denikin’s authority could reach, protection was always accorded to the Jewish population, and strenuous efforts were made by his officers to prevent reprisals and to punish those guilty of them. So much was this the case that the Petlurist propaganda against General Denikin denounced him as the Protector of the Jews. The Misses Healy, nieces of Mr. Tim Healy, in relating their personal experiences in Kieff, have declared that to their knowledge on more than one occasion officers who committed offenses against Jews were reduced to the ranks and sent out of the city to the front. But the hordes of brigands by whom the whole. vast expanse of the Russian Empire is becoming infested do not hesitate to gratify their lust for blood and for revenge at the expense of the innocent Jewish population whenever an opportunity occurs. The brigand Makhno, the hordes of Petlura and of Gregorieff, who signalized their every success by the most brutal massacres, everywhere found among the half-stupefied, half-infuriated population an eager response to anti-Semitism in its worst and foulest forms.

The fact that in many cases Jewish interests and Jewish places of worship are excepted by the Bolsheviks from their universal hostility has tended more and more to associate the Jewish race in Russia with the villainies, which are now being perpetrated. This is an injustice on millions of helpless people, most of whom are themselves sufferers from the revolutionary regime. It becomes, therefore, specially important to foster and develop any strongly-marked Jewish movement which leads directly away from these fatal associations. And it is here that Zionism has such a deep significance for the whole world at the present time.

A Home for the Jews

Zionism offers the third sphere to the political conceptions of the Jewish race. In violent contrast to international communism, it presents to the Jew a national idea of a commanding character. it has fallen to the British Government, as the result of the conquest of Palestine, to have the opportunity and the responsibility of securing for the Jewish race all over the world a home and centre of national life. The statesmanship and historic sense of Mr. Balfour were prompt to seize this opportunity. Declarations have now been made which have irrevocably decided the policy of Great Britain. The fiery energies of Dr. Weissmann, the leader, for practical purposes, of the Zionist project. backed by many of the most prominent British Jews, and supported by the full authority of Lord Allenby, are all directed to achieving the success of this inspiring movement.

Of course, Palestine is far too small to accommodate more than a fraction of the Jewish race, nor do the majority of national Jews wish to go there. But if, as may well happen, there should be created in our own lifetime by the banks of the Jordan a Jewish State under the protection of the British Crown, which might comprise three or four millions of Jews, an event would have occurred in the history of the world which would, from every point of view, be beneficial, and would be especially in harmony with the truest interests of the British Empire.

Zionism has already become a factor in the political convulsions of Russia, as a powerful competing influence in Bolshevik circles with the international communistic system. Nothing could be more significant than the fury with which Trotsky has attacked the Zionists generally, and Dr. Weissmann in particular. The cruel penetration of his mind leaves him in no doubt that his schemes of a world-wide communistic State under Jewish domination are directly thwarted and hindered by this new ideal, which directs the energies and the hopes of Jews in every land towards a simpler, a truer, and a far more attainable goal. The struggle which is now beginning between the Zionist and Bolshevik Jews is little less than a struggle for the soul of the Jewish people.

Duty of Loyal Jews

It is particularly important in these circumstances that the national Jews in every country who are loyal to the land of their adoption should come forward on every occasion, as many of them in England have already done, and take a prominent part in every measure for combating the Bolshevik conspiracy. In this way they will be able to vindicate the honor of the Jewish name and make it clear to all the world that the Bolshevik movement is not a Jewish movement, but is repudiated vehemently by the great mass of the Jewish race.

But a negative resistance to Bolshevism in any field is not enough. Positive and practicable alternatives are needed in the moral as well as in the social sphere; and in building up with the utmost possible rapidity a Jewish national centre in Palestine which may become not only a refuge to the oppressed from the unhappy lands of Central Europe, but which will also be a symbol of Jewish unity and the temple of Jewish glory, a task is presented on which many blessings rest.